On 12/12/05, David S. Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: "David S. Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2005 21:08:27 -0800 (PST)
>
> > Then we shouldn't be changing BIC, but instead make a new
> > tcp_cubic.c :-)
>
> As I mentioned in my net-2.6.16 rebase posting tonight,
> I too
From: "David S. Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2005 21:08:27 -0800 (PST)
> Then we shouldn't be changing BIC, but instead make a new
> tcp_cubic.c :-)
As I mentioned in my net-2.6.16 rebase posting tonight,
I took care of this.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubs
From: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 20:18:05 -0800
> For 2.6.16, since BIC will be moving to a new version and there is a
> potential for instability; please consider the following that makes Reno
> the default unless advanced congestion is selected.
>
> Signed-off-b
On 12/7/05, Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For 2.6.16, since BIC will be moving to a new version and there is a
> potential for instability; please consider the following that makes Reno
> the default unless advanced congestion is selected.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <[EMA
For 2.6.16, since BIC will be moving to a new version and there is a
potential for instability; please consider the following that makes Reno
the default unless advanced congestion is selected.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- bic-2.6.orig/net/ipv4/Kconfig
+++ bic-2.6/net/