On 8/2/20 8:14 AM, 王文虎 wrote:
>
>>> Currently the qmi_handle is initialized single threaded and strictly
>>> ordered with the active set to 1. This is pretty simple and safe but
>>> sometimes ineffency. So it is better to allow user to decide whether
>>> a high priority workqueue should be used.
>
>> Currently the qmi_handle is initialized single threaded and strictly
>> ordered with the active set to 1. This is pretty simple and safe but
>> sometimes ineffency. So it is better to allow user to decide whether
>> a high priority workqueue should be used.
>
>Can you please describe a scenario
On Mon 27 Jul 08:03 PDT 2020, ? wrote:
> Currently the qmi_handle is initialized single threaded and strictly
> ordered with the active set to 1. This is pretty simple and safe but
> sometimes ineffency. So it is better to allow user to decide whether
> a high priority workqueue should be
From: 王文虎
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2020 23:03:16 +0800 (GMT+08:00)
> Currently the qmi_handle is initialized single threaded and strictly
> ordered with the active set to 1. This is pretty simple and safe but
> sometimes ineffency. So it is better to allow user to decide whether
> a high priority workqu
Currently the qmi_handle is initialized single threaded and strictly
ordered with the active set to 1. This is pretty simple and safe but
sometimes ineffency. So it is better to allow user to decide whether
a high priority workqueue should be used.
Signed-off-by: Wang Wenhu
---
drivers/net/ipa/i