Arnaud Patard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
[...]
> I've also tested the two others patches as suggested but I didn't
> notice any difference (I got only "eth0: GMII mode"). Unfortunately,
> I'm not sure that the test is reliable as the PHY
> transceiver of my card is unknow to the driver...
The test is
Francois Romieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Arnaud Patard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
> [...]
>
> Btw it would be nice if you could give a quick test to the three
> attached patches against 2.6.13-git: #0, #0 + #1, #0 + #1 + #2.
The first patch 160 works as expected.
I've also tested the two others
Arnaud Patard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
[...]
Btw it would be nice if you could give a quick test to the three
attached patches against 2.6.13-git: #0, #0 + #1, #0 + #1 + #2.
--
Ueimor
diff -puN drivers/net/sis190.c~sis190-160 drivers/net/sis190.c
--- a/drivers/net/sis190.c~sis190-160 2005-08-31 00
Arnaud Patard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
[...]
> During tests, I noticed that the loss of link was not handled. This was
> resulting of some stranges situations like mii-tool saying "no link" and
> ethtool saying "link detected". Moreover, this prevents daemons like
> ifplugd to work.
>
> I've made a p
Hi,
During tests, I noticed that the loss of link was not handled. This was
resulting of some stranges situations like mii-tool saying "no link" and
ethtool saying "link detected". Moreover, this prevents daemons like
ifplugd to work.
I've made a patch for this but I'm not sure if it's the correc
