On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 10:49:06PM +0200, Jonas Falkevik wrote:
> On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 6:10 PM Xin Long wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 9:10 PM Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 04:42:16PM +0800, Xin Long wrote:
> > > > On Sat, May 23, 2020 at 8:04 P
On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 6:10 PM Xin Long wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 9:10 PM Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 04:42:16PM +0800, Xin Long wrote:
> > > On Sat, May 23, 2020 at 8:04 PM Jonas Falkevik
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 10:42
On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 9:10 PM Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 04:42:16PM +0800, Xin Long wrote:
> > On Sat, May 23, 2020 at 8:04 PM Jonas Falkevik
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 10:42 PM Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Ma
On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 04:42:16PM +0800, Xin Long wrote:
> On Sat, May 23, 2020 at 8:04 PM Jonas Falkevik
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 10:42 PM Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 10:30:29AM +0200, Jonas Falkevik wrote:
> > > > On Wed, May 13, 2020
On Sat, May 23, 2020 at 8:04 PM Jonas Falkevik wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 10:42 PM Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 10:30:29AM +0200, Jonas Falkevik wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 11:32 PM Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed,
On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 10:42 PM Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 10:30:29AM +0200, Jonas Falkevik wrote:
> > On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 11:32 PM Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 10:11:05PM +0200, Jonas Falkevik wrote:
> > > > On Wed, M
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 10:30:29AM +0200, Jonas Falkevik wrote:
> On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 11:32 PM Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 10:11:05PM +0200, Jonas Falkevik wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 6:01 PM Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 11:32 PM Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 10:11:05PM +0200, Jonas Falkevik wrote:
> > On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 6:01 PM Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 04:52:16PM +0200, Jonas Falkevik wrote:
> > > > Do not gen
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 10:11:05PM +0200, Jonas Falkevik wrote:
> On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 6:01 PM Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 04:52:16PM +0200, Jonas Falkevik wrote:
> > > Do not generate SCTP_ADDR_{MADE_PRIM,ADDED} events for SCTP_FUTURE_ASSOC
> > > assocs.
>
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 6:01 PM Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 04:52:16PM +0200, Jonas Falkevik wrote:
> > Do not generate SCTP_ADDR_{MADE_PRIM,ADDED} events for SCTP_FUTURE_ASSOC
> > assocs.
>
> How did you get them?
>
I think one case is when receiving INIT chunk in
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 04:52:16PM +0200, Jonas Falkevik wrote:
> Do not generate SCTP_ADDR_{MADE_PRIM,ADDED} events for SCTP_FUTURE_ASSOC
> assocs.
How did you get them?
I'm thinking you're fixing a side-effect of another issue here. For
example, in sctp_assoc_update(), it first calls sctp_asso
Do not generate SCTP_ADDR_{MADE_PRIM,ADDED} events for SCTP_FUTURE_ASSOC assocs.
These events are described in rfc6458#section-6.1
SCTP_PEER_ADDR_CHANGE:
This tag indicates that an address that is
part of an existing association has experienced a change of
state (e.g., a failure or return to servi
12 matches
Mail list logo