Re: [PATCH] rxrpc: Fix a memory leak in rxkad_verify_response()

2020-05-21 Thread Markus Elfring
> How do you think about a wording variant like the following? > >A ticket was not released after a call of the function “platform_get_irq” > failed. I should have specified an other function name here. A ticket was not released after a call of the function “rxkad_decrypt_ticket” failed.

Re: [PATCH] rxrpc: Fix a memory leak in rxkad_verify_response()

2020-05-21 Thread Markus Elfring
> In function rxkad_verify_response(), pointer "ticket" is not released, > when function rxkad_decrypt_ticket() returns an error, causing a > memory leak bug. I suggest to improve also this change description. How do you think about a wording variant like the following? A ticket was not releas