On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 2:17 PM, Tom Psyborg wrote:
>
>
> On 16 May 2017 at 16:31, Jes Sorensen wrote:
>>
>>
>> True - if the automatic conversion works without automatic intervention, I
>> am less worried about it. Personally I would still focus on converting one
>> function at a time to reduce
From: Johannes Berg
Date: Tue, 16 May 2017 13:58:56 +0200
> On Tue, 2017-05-16 at 13:55 +0200, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
>>
>> In rt2x00 driver we use poor convention in other kind of registers
>> accessors like bbp, mac, eeprom. I dislike to changing only rfcsr
>> accessors and leaving others in
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 4:23 PM, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 01:55:17PM +0200, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
>> On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 10:39:51AM -0400, David Miller wrote:
>> > From: Stanislaw Gruszka
>> > Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 16:28:01 +0200
>> >
>> > > On Mon, May 15, 2017
On 05/16/2017 10:19 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 3:44 PM, Jes Sorensen wrote:
On 05/16/2017 07:55 AM, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 10:39:51AM -0400, David Miller wrote:
Passing return values by reference is and always has been a really
poor way to ach
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 01:55:17PM +0200, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 10:39:51AM -0400, David Miller wrote:
> > From: Stanislaw Gruszka
> > Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 16:28:01 +0200
> >
> > > On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 03:46:55PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > >> With CONFIG_KASA
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 3:44 PM, Jes Sorensen wrote:
> On 05/16/2017 07:55 AM, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 10:39:51AM -0400, David Miller wrote:
>>>
>>> Passing return values by reference is and always has been a really
>>> poor way to achieve what these functions are do
On 05/16/2017 07:55 AM, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 10:39:51AM -0400, David Miller wrote:
Passing return values by reference is and always has been a really
poor way to achieve what these functions are doing.
And frankly, whilst the tool could see what's going on here bette
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 01:58:56PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-05-16 at 13:55 +0200, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> >
> > In rt2x00 driver we use poor convention in other kind of registers
> > accessors like bbp, mac, eeprom. I dislike to changing only rfcsr
> > accessors and leaving ot
On Tue, 2017-05-16 at 13:55 +0200, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
>
> In rt2x00 driver we use poor convention in other kind of registers
> accessors like bbp, mac, eeprom. I dislike to changing only rfcsr
> accessors and leaving others in the old way. And changing all
> accessors would be massive and er
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 10:39:51AM -0400, David Miller wrote:
> From: Stanislaw Gruszka
> Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 16:28:01 +0200
>
> > On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 03:46:55PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >> With CONFIG_KASAN enabled and gcc-7, we get a warning about rather high
> >> stack usage (with
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 10:40:52AM -0400, David Miller wrote:
> From: Arnd Bergmann
> Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 16:36:45 +0200
>
> > On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 4:28 PM, Stanislaw Gruszka
> > wrote:
> >> On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 03:46:55PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >>> With CONFIG_KASAN enabled and
From: Arnd Bergmann
Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 16:36:45 +0200
> On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 4:28 PM, Stanislaw Gruszka
> wrote:
>> On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 03:46:55PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> With CONFIG_KASAN enabled and gcc-7, we get a warning about rather high
>>> stack usage (with a private p
From: Stanislaw Gruszka
Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 16:28:01 +0200
> On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 03:46:55PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> With CONFIG_KASAN enabled and gcc-7, we get a warning about rather high
>> stack usage (with a private patch set I have to turn on this warning,
>> which I intend to g
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 4:28 PM, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 03:46:55PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> With CONFIG_KASAN enabled and gcc-7, we get a warning about rather high
>> stack usage (with a private patch set I have to turn on this warning,
>> which I intend to get in
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 03:46:55PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> With CONFIG_KASAN enabled and gcc-7, we get a warning about rather high
> stack usage (with a private patch set I have to turn on this warning,
> which I intend to get into the next kernel release):
>
> wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2800l
With CONFIG_KASAN enabled and gcc-7, we get a warning about rather high
stack usage (with a private patch set I have to turn on this warning,
which I intend to get into the next kernel release):
wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c: In function 'rt2800_bw_filter_calibration':
wireless/ralink/rt2x00/
16 matches
Mail list logo
