From: Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 21:53:25 +0100
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 07:29:36PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Mid-term I plan to restructure the file_operations so that we don't need
> > to have all these duplicate aio and vectored versions. This patch
On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 07:29:36PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Mid-term I plan to restructure the file_operations so that we don't need
> to have all these duplicate aio and vectored versions. This patch is
> a small step in that direction but also a worthwile cleanup on it's own:
>
> (1) i
On 12/13/05, Benjamin LaHaise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Christoph,
>
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 07:29:36PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Mid-term I plan to restructure the file_operations so that we don't need
> > to have all these duplicate aio and vectored versions. This patch is
>
On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 01:43:23PM -0500, Benjamin LaHaise wrote:
> Hello Christoph,
>
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 07:29:36PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Mid-term I plan to restructure the file_operations so that we don't need
> > to have all these duplicate aio and vectored versions. This
Hello Christoph,
On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 07:29:36PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Mid-term I plan to restructure the file_operations so that we don't need
> to have all these duplicate aio and vectored versions. This patch is
> a small step in that direction but also a worthwile cleanup on it
Mid-term I plan to restructure the file_operations so that we don't need
to have all these duplicate aio and vectored versions. This patch is
a small step in that direction but also a worthwile cleanup on it's own:
(1) introduce a alloc_sock_iocb helper that encapsulates allocating a
proper s
