Hi Niklas,
On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 1:32 PM, Niklas Söderlund
wrote:
> On 2017-05-18 10:52:25 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 2:16 PM, Niklas Söderlund
>> wrote:
>> > On 2017-05-16 13:36:21 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> >> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 1:01 PM, Simon H
Hi Geert,
On 2017-05-18 10:52:25 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Niklas,
>
> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 2:16 PM, Niklas Söderlund
> wrote:
> > On 2017-05-16 13:36:21 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 1:01 PM, Simon Horman wrote:
> >> > Is there some way for - e.g.
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 02:16:04PM +0200, Niklas Söderlund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2017-05-16 13:36:21 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > Hi Simon,
> >
> > On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 1:01 PM, Simon Horman wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 11:07:34AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > >> On Tue,
Hi Niklas,
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 2:16 PM, Niklas Söderlund
wrote:
> On 2017-05-16 13:36:21 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 1:01 PM, Simon Horman wrote:
>> > Is there some way for - e.g. the driver - to not enable WoL on Gen3 SoCs
>> > until the clock issues is sorte
Hi,
On 2017-05-16 13:36:21 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 1:01 PM, Simon Horman wrote:
> > On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 11:07:34AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 11:02 AM, Niklas Söderlund
> >> wrote:
> >> >> > Whit all this be
Hi Simon,
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 1:01 PM, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 11:07:34AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 11:02 AM, Niklas Söderlund
>> wrote:
>> >> > Whit all this being said I still like to withdraw this patch as I found
>> >> > another fau
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 11:07:34AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Niklas,
>
> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 11:02 AM, Niklas Söderlund
> wrote:
> >> > Whit all this being said I still like to withdraw this patch as I found
> >> > another fault with it, ravb_wol_restore() will unconditionally be
Hi Niklas,
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 11:02 AM, Niklas Söderlund
wrote:
>> > Whit all this being said I still like to withdraw this patch as I found
>> > another fault with it, ravb_wol_restore() will unconditionally be called
>> > while ravb_wol_setup() will only be called if netif_running(ndev). T
Hi Geert,
Thanks for your feedback.
On 2017-05-16 09:48:51 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Niklas,
>
> On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 11:12 PM, Niklas Söderlund
> wrote:
> > On 2017-05-12 16:43:55 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >> On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 4:32 PM, Niklas Söderlund
> >> wrote
Hi Niklas,
On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 11:12 PM, Niklas Söderlund
wrote:
> On 2017-05-12 16:43:55 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 4:32 PM, Niklas Söderlund
>> wrote:
>> > On 2017-05-12 14:58:53 +0200, Niklas Söderlund wrote:
>> >> On 2017-05-12 14:47:53 +0200, Geert Uytte
Hi Geert,
On 2017-05-12 16:43:55 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Niklas,
>
> On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 4:32 PM, Niklas Söderlund
> wrote:
> > On 2017-05-12 14:58:53 +0200, Niklas Söderlund wrote:
> >> On 2017-05-12 14:47:53 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >> > On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 12:2
Hi Niklas,
On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 4:32 PM, Niklas Söderlund
wrote:
> On 2017-05-12 14:58:53 +0200, Niklas Söderlund wrote:
>> On 2017-05-12 14:47:53 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> > On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 12:27 AM, Niklas Söderlund
>> > wrote:
>> > > WoL is enabled in the suspend callback
Hi Geert,
On 2017-05-12 14:58:53 +0200, Niklas Söderlund wrote:
> Hi Geert,
>
> Thanks for testing.
>
> On 2017-05-12 14:47:53 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > Hi Niklas,
> >
> > On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 12:27 AM, Niklas Söderlund
> > wrote:
> > > WoL is enabled in the suspend callback by s
Hi Niklas,
On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 2:58 PM, Niklas Söderlund
wrote:
> On 2017-05-12 14:47:53 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 12:27 AM, Niklas Söderlund
>> wrote:
>> > WoL is enabled in the suspend callback by setting MagicPacket detection
>> > and disabling all interr
Hi Geert,
Thanks for testing.
On 2017-05-12 14:47:53 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Niklas,
>
> On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 12:27 AM, Niklas Söderlund
> wrote:
> > WoL is enabled in the suspend callback by setting MagicPacket detection
> > and disabling all interrupts expect MagicPacket. In
Hi Niklas,
On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 12:27 AM, Niklas Söderlund
wrote:
> WoL is enabled in the suspend callback by setting MagicPacket detection
> and disabling all interrupts expect MagicPacket. In the resume path the
> driver needs to reset the hardware to rearm the WoL logic, this prevents
> the
Hello!
On 05/12/2017 01:27 AM, Niklas Söderlund wrote:
WoL is enabled in the suspend callback by setting MagicPacket detection
and disabling all interrupts expect MagicPacket. In the resume path the
Except.
driver needs to reset the hardware to rearm the WoL logic, this prevents
the driv
WoL is enabled in the suspend callback by setting MagicPacket detection
and disabling all interrupts expect MagicPacket. In the resume path the
driver needs to reset the hardware to rearm the WoL logic, this prevents
the driver from simply restoring the registers and to take advantage of
that ravb
18 matches
Mail list logo