Re: [PATCH] pcnet32: break in 2.6.18-rc1 identified (corrected)

2006-08-09 Thread Jeff Garzik
Don Fry wrote: When I have some positive results, I will add the signed-off-by line and resubmit the patch or ask for the old patch to be removed. When does the patch need to be submitted in order to be included in 2.6.18? A couple weeks, Linus posted that he won't be back until towards the en

Re: [PATCH] pcnet32: break in 2.6.18-rc1 identified (corrected)

2006-08-09 Thread Don Fry
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 12:01:34AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Don Fry wrote: > >I noticed this morning that I had the polarity wrong in my patch > >yesterday for older chips in the pcnet32_suspend routine. Here is the > >correct patch to test. > > > >>A change I made for 2.6.17 and another for 2.

Re: [PATCH] pcnet32: break in 2.6.18-rc1 identified (corrected)

2006-08-08 Thread Jeff Garzik
Don Fry wrote: I noticed this morning that I had the polarity wrong in my patch yesterday for older chips in the pcnet32_suspend routine. Here is the correct patch to test. A change I made for 2.6.17 and another for 2.6.18 do not work on older pcnet32 chips which I do not have access to. Plea

[PATCH] pcnet32: break in 2.6.18-rc1 identified (corrected)

2006-08-04 Thread Don Fry
I noticed this morning that I had the polarity wrong in my patch yesterday for older chips in the pcnet32_suspend routine. Here is the correct patch to test. > A change I made for 2.6.17 and another for 2.6.18 do not work on older > pcnet32 chips which I do not have access to. Please test this p