On 2019/3/5 15:31, Steffen Klassert wrote:
On Tue, Mar 05, 2019 at 03:08:49PM +0800, Su Yanjun
wrote:
On 2019/3/5 14:49, Herbert Xu wrote:
On Sun, Mar 03, 2019 at 10:47:39PM -0500, Su Yanjun wrote:
When i review xfrm_user.c code, i found some potentical bug in it.
In xfrm_user_rcvmsg if
On Tue, Mar 05, 2019 at 03:08:49PM +0800, Su Yanjun
wrote:
> On 2019/3/5 14:49, Herbert Xu wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Mar 03, 2019 at 10:47:39PM -0500, Su Yanjun wrote:
> > > When i review xfrm_user.c code, i found some potentical bug in it.
> > >
> > > In xfrm_user_rcvmsg if type parameter from user
On Sun, Mar 03, 2019 at 10:47:39PM -0500, Su Yanjun wrote:
> When i review xfrm_user.c code, i found some potentical bug in it.
>
> In xfrm_user_rcvmsg if type parameter from user space is set to
> XFRM_MSG_MAX or XFRM_MSG_NEWSADINFO or XFRM_MSG_NEWSPDINFO. It will cause
> xfrm_user_rcv_msg refe
When i review xfrm_user.c code, i found some potentical bug in it.
In xfrm_user_rcvmsg if type parameter from user space is set to
XFRM_MSG_MAX or XFRM_MSG_NEWSADINFO or XFRM_MSG_NEWSPDINFO. It will cause
xfrm_user_rcv_msg referring to null entry in xfrm_dispatch array.
Signed-off-by: Su Yanjun