From: Eric Dumazet
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 14:26:07 +0200
> On Tue, 2015-07-14 at 15:15 +0300, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
>
>> Simple warn-once will hide a lot of information which could be useful.
>> Also dst entry leak is better than freeing actually active entry.
>
> Then BUG_ON() .
>
> Re
On Tue, 2015-07-14 at 15:15 +0300, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
> Simple warn-once will hide a lot of information which could be useful.
> Also dst entry leak is better than freeing actually active entry.
Then BUG_ON() .
Really, we need to fix leaks, not brown paper them.
--
To unsubscribe fr
On 14.07.2015 15:04, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Tue, 2015-07-14 at 14:43 +0300, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
Kernel generates a lot of warnings when dst entry reference counter
overflows and becomes negative. This patch prints address of dst entry,
its refcount and then resets reference counter to I
On Tue, 2015-07-14 at 14:43 +0300, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
> Kernel generates a lot of warnings when dst entry reference counter
> overflows and becomes negative. This patch prints address of dst entry,
> its refcount and then resets reference counter to INT_MAX/2.
>
> That bug was seen sever
Kernel generates a lot of warnings when dst entry reference counter
overflows and becomes negative. This patch prints address of dst entry,
its refcount and then resets reference counter to INT_MAX/2.
That bug was seen several times at machines with outdated 3.10.y kernels.
Most like it's already
