On 五, 2017-02-10 at 10:25 -0500, David Miller wrote:
> From: yuan linyu
> Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 20:11:13 +0800
>
> > From: yuan linyu
> >
> > SCM_MAX_FD can fully replace it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: yuan linyu
>
> I don't think so:
>
> > @@ -341,7 +332,6 @@ struct scm_fp_list *scm_fp_dup(st
From: yuan linyu
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 20:11:13 +0800
> From: yuan linyu
>
> SCM_MAX_FD can fully replace it.
>
> Signed-off-by: yuan linyu
I don't think so:
> @@ -341,7 +332,6 @@ struct scm_fp_list *scm_fp_dup(struct scm_fp_list *fpl)
> if (new_fpl) {
> for (i = 0; i <
From: yuan linyu
SCM_MAX_FD can fully replace it.
Signed-off-by: yuan linyu
---
include/net/scm.h | 3 +--
net/core/scm.c| 20 +---
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/scm.h b/include/net/scm.h
index 59fa93c..1301227 100644
--- a/inc
