From: Andrea Merello
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2019 15:53:32 +0200
> mdio_device_reset() makes use of the atomic-pretending API flavor for
> handling the PHY reset GPIO line.
>
> I found no hint that mdio_device_reset() is called from atomic context
> and indeed it uses usleep_range() since long time, s
On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 03:53:32PM +0200, Andrea Merello wrote:
> mdio_device_reset() makes use of the atomic-pretending API flavor for
> handling the PHY reset GPIO line.
>
> I found no hint that mdio_device_reset() is called from atomic context
> and indeed it uses usleep_range() since long time
mdio_device_reset() makes use of the atomic-pretending API flavor for
handling the PHY reset GPIO line.
I found no hint that mdio_device_reset() is called from atomic context
and indeed it uses usleep_range() since long time, so I would assume that
it is OK to sleep there.
This patch switch to gp