Hi,
On 5/14/20 12:00 PM, Jeremy Linton wrote:
The commit "disregard Clause 22 registers present bit..." clears
the low bit of the devices_in_package data which is being used
in get_phy_c45_ids() to determine if a phy/register is responding
correctly. That check is against 0x1FFF, but since t
Hi,
On 5/14/20 2:59 PM, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
On 14.05.2020 19:00, Jeremy Linton wrote:
The commit "disregard Clause 22 registers present bit..." clears
the low bit of the devices_in_package data which is being used
in get_phy_c45_ids() to determine if a phy/register is responding
correctly. T
On 14.05.2020 19:00, Jeremy Linton wrote:
> The commit "disregard Clause 22 registers present bit..." clears
> the low bit of the devices_in_package data which is being used
> in get_phy_c45_ids() to determine if a phy/register is responding
> correctly. That check is against 0x1FFF, but since
The commit "disregard Clause 22 registers present bit..." clears
the low bit of the devices_in_package data which is being used
in get_phy_c45_ids() to determine if a phy/register is responding
correctly. That check is against 0x1FFF, but since the low
bit is always cleared, the check can never