On Sun, Apr 09, 2017 at 09:12:18AM +0530, Arushi Singhal wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 9, 2017 at 1:44 AM, Pablo Neira Ayuso
> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Apr 08, 2017 at 08:21:56PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> > > On Saturday 2017-04-08 19:21, Arushi Singhal wrote:
> > >
> > > >Replace explicit NULL compariso
2017-04-09 16:26 GMT+08:00 Jan Engelhardt :
>
> On Sunday 2017-04-09 05:42, Arushi Singhal wrote:
>>On Sun, Apr 9, 2017 at 1:44 AM, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 08, 2017 at 08:21:56PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>> > On Saturday 2017-04-08 19:21, Arushi Singhal wrote:
>>
On Sunday 2017-04-09 05:42, Arushi Singhal wrote:
>On Sun, Apr 9, 2017 at 1:44 AM, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 08, 2017 at 08:21:56PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> > On Saturday 2017-04-08 19:21, Arushi Singhal wrote:
> >
> > >Replace explicit NULL comparison with
On Sat, Apr 08, 2017 at 08:21:56PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On Saturday 2017-04-08 19:21, Arushi Singhal wrote:
>
> >Replace explicit NULL comparison with ! operator to simplify code.
>
> I still wouldn't do this, for the same reason as before. Comparing to
> NULL explicitly more or less g
On Saturday 2017-04-08 19:21, Arushi Singhal wrote:
>Replace explicit NULL comparison with ! operator to simplify code.
I still wouldn't do this, for the same reason as before. Comparing to
NULL explicitly more or less gave an extra guarantee that the other
operand was also a pointer.
Replace explicit NULL comparison with ! operator to simplify code.
Signed-off-by: Arushi Singhal
---
net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_broadcast.c | 2 +-
net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c | 2 +-
net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_ecache.c| 4 +--
net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_helper.c| 4 +--
n
