> > Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn
> >
> > Andrew
>
> Just wondering, now, a v2 patch isn't needed? Or should I amend the commit
> text?
Hi Mike
Take a look in patchwork.kernel.org. It has been flaky the last few
days. If the patch is not there, you definitively need to repost. If
you do find i
Met vriendelijke groet / kind regards,
Mike Looijmans
System Expert
TOPIC Embedded Products B.V.
Materiaalweg 4, 5681 RJ Best
The Netherlands
T: +31 (0) 499 33 69 69
E: mike.looijm...@topicproducts.com
W: www.topicproducts.com
Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
On 2
On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 09:45:41AM +0100, Mike Looijmans wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Response below...
Hi Mike
Everybody here knows that top posting is evil, we don't do it. We
expect the replay to be inline.
> > Hi Mike
> >
> > Did you look at the per PHY reset? mdiobus_register_gpiod() gets the
Hi Andrew,
Response below...
Met vriendelijke groet / kind regards,
Mike Looijmans
System Expert
TOPIC Embedded Products B.V.
Materiaalweg 4, 5681 RJ Best
The Netherlands
T: +31 (0) 499 33 69 69
E: mike.looijm...@topicproducts.com
W: www.topicproducts.com
Please consider the environment be
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 08:33:37AM +0100, Mike Looijmans wrote:
> The mdio_bus reset code first de-asserted the reset by allocating with
> GPIOD_OUT_LOW, then asserted and de-asserted again. In other words, if
> the reset signal defaulted to asserted, there'd be a short "spike"
> before the reset.
On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 12:25:55AM +, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 01:00:57AM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 01:49:38PM +, Russell King - ARM Linux admin
> > wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 02:14:40PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 01:00:57AM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 01:49:38PM +, Russell King - ARM Linux admin
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 02:14:40PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 08:33:37AM +0100, Mike Looijmans wrote:
> > > > The mdio_b
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 01:49:38PM +, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 02:14:40PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 08:33:37AM +0100, Mike Looijmans wrote:
> > > The mdio_bus reset code first de-asserted the reset by allocating with
> > > GPIOD
On Wed, 27 Jan 2021 08:08:29 +0100 Mike Looijmans wrote:
> > Andrew, I don't get what you're saying.
> >
> > Here is what happens depending on the pre-existing state of the
> > reset signal:
> >
> > Reset (previously asserted): ~~~|_||___
> > Reset (previously deasserted): _||
See below.
Met vriendelijke groet / kind regards,
Mike Looijmans
System Expert
TOPIC Embedded Products B.V.
Materiaalweg 4, 5681 RJ Best
The Netherlands
T: +31 (0) 499 33 69 69
E: mike.looijm...@topicproducts.com
W: www.topicproducts.com
Please consider the environment before printing this
The mdio_bus reset code first de-asserted the reset by allocating with
GPIOD_OUT_LOW, then asserted and de-asserted again. In other words, if
the reset signal defaulted to asserted, there'd be a short "spike"
before the reset.
Instead, directly assert the reset signal using GPIOD_OUT_HIGH, this
re
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 02:14:40PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 08:33:37AM +0100, Mike Looijmans wrote:
> > The mdio_bus reset code first de-asserted the reset by allocating with
> > GPIOD_OUT_LOW, then asserted and de-asserted again. In other words, if
> > the reset signal d
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 08:33:37AM +0100, Mike Looijmans wrote:
> The mdio_bus reset code first de-asserted the reset by allocating with
> GPIOD_OUT_LOW, then asserted and de-asserted again. In other words, if
> the reset signal defaulted to asserted, there'd be a short "spike"
> before the reset.
13 matches
Mail list logo
