From: Ivan Khoronzhuk
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2016 01:11:54 +0300
> There is no reason to destroy channels that are destroyed while
> cpdma_ctlr destroy. In this case no need to remember how much
> channels where created and destroy them by one, as cpdma_ctlr
> destroys all of them.
>
> Signed-off-by:
On 11.06.16 12:24, Ivan Khoronzhuk wrote:
On 11.06.16 04:17, David Miller wrote:
From: Ivan Khoronzhuk
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2016 01:11:54 +0300
Based on master
master... of what?
master of
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
but it's applicable on linux-next
On 11.06.16 04:17, David Miller wrote:
From: Ivan Khoronzhuk
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2016 01:11:54 +0300
Based on master
master... of what?
master of
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
but it's applicable on linux-next master also.
--
Regards,
Ivan Khoronzhuk
From: Ivan Khoronzhuk
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2016 01:11:54 +0300
> Based on master
master... of what?
There is no reason to destroy channels that are destroyed while
cpdma_ctlr destroy. In this case no need to remember how much
channels where created and destroy them by one, as cpdma_ctlr
destroys all of them.
Signed-off-by: Ivan Khoronzhuk
---
Based on master
drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c |
