On 09/06/16 13:47, Vivien Didelot wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> Vivien Didelot writes:
>
>> Most of them are fixed or being handled in net-next.
>>
>> I don't know if net should diverge or if it can live with these
>> warnings...
>
> In fact I have a series in net-next fixing a few checkpatch.pl issue.
Hi Ben,
Vivien Didelot writes:
> Most of them are fixed or being handled in net-next.
>
> I don't know if net should diverge or if it can live with these
> warnings...
In fact I have a series in net-next fixing a few checkpatch.pl issue. If
you don't mind I can rebase your fix and integrate the
Hi Ben,
Ben Dooks writes:
> The driver has a number of functions that are not exported or
> declared elsewhere, so make them static to avoid the following
> warnings from sparse:
>
> drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.c:113:5: warning: symbol 'mv88e6xxx_reg_read' was
> not declared. Should it be static?
The driver has a number of functions that are not exported or
declared elsewhere, so make them static to avoid the following
warnings from sparse:
drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.c:113:5: warning: symbol 'mv88e6xxx_reg_read' was not
declared. Should it be static?
drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.c:167:5: warn
