On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 11:10 AM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Dimitris Michailidis
> Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 15:33:35 -0700
>
>> The goal of netdev_add_tso_features() is to enable all TSO features but
>> it unintentionally loses NETIF_F_ALL_FOR_ALL features. This is because
>> the netdev_increment
From: Dimitris Michailidis
Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 15:33:35 -0700
> The goal of netdev_add_tso_features() is to enable all TSO features but
> it unintentionally loses NETIF_F_ALL_FOR_ALL features. This is because
> the netdev_increment_features() it calls clears any NETIF_F_ALL_FOR_ALL
> bits that
The goal of netdev_add_tso_features() is to enable all TSO features but
it unintentionally loses NETIF_F_ALL_FOR_ALL features. This is because
the netdev_increment_features() it calls clears any NETIF_F_ALL_FOR_ALL
bits that aren't included in the incremental features and none of them
are included