On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 10:04:25 +0800 Yejune Deng wrote:
> See Documentation/timers/timers-howto.rst, msleep() is not
> for (1ms - 20ms), use usleep_range() instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yejune Deng
# Form letter - net-next is closed
We have already sent the networking pull request for 5.11 and ther
See Documentation/timers/timers-howto.rst, msleep() is not
for (1ms - 20ms), use usleep_range() instead.
Signed-off-by: Yejune Deng
---
net/core/dev.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index d33099f..c0aa52f 100644
--- a/net/c
Does anyone else have a different opinion? If not,I will adopt it and resubmit.
On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 6:19 PM Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 10:35 AM Yejune Deng wrote:
> >
> > See Documentation/timers/timers-howto.rst, msleep() is not
> > for (1ms - 20ms), There is a more adv
See Documentation/timers/timers-howto.rst, msleep() is not
for (1ms - 20ms), There is a more advanced API is used.
Signed-off-by: Yejune Deng
---
net/core/dev.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index d33099f..6e83ee03 100644