On Wednesday 11 January 2006 06:28, Shaun Pereira wrote:
> And the correct x.25 patch, (will build a [PATCH] if this is ok).
> Tested with with xot to a Cisco box.
Much better now, but
> + switch(cmd) {
> + case TIOCOUTQ:
> + case TIOCINQ:
Looking at how these
And the correct x.25 patch, (will build a [PATCH] if this is ok).
Tested with with xot to a Cisco box.
Thanks once again for your help
/Shaun
Index: linux-2.6.15/net/x25/af_x25.c
===
--- linux-2.6.15.orig/net/x25/af_x25.c
+++ linux-
On 1/9/06, Arnd Bergmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 09 January 2006 06:46, Shaun Pereira wrote:
> > Since we are interested in ioctl's from userspace I have not added the
> > .compat_ioctl function pointer to struct net_device. The assumption
> > being once the userspace data has reach
On Monday 09 January 2006 06:46, Shaun Pereira wrote:
> Hi all,
> The attached patch is a follow up to a post made earlier to this site
> with regard to 32 bit (socket layer) ioctl emulation for 64 bit kernels.
Ok, cool. Note that I also posted a longer series of patches that does
this and much mo
Hi all,
The attached patch is a follow up to a post made earlier to this site
with regard to 32 bit (socket layer) ioctl emulation for 64 bit kernels.
I needed to implement 32 bit userland ioctl support for modular (x.25)
socket ioctls in a 64 bit kernel. With the removal of the
register_ioctl32_c
