On Thu, 4 Feb 2021 10:51:59 -0800 Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Feb 2021 15:02:30 +0600 Sabyrzhan Tasbolatov wrote:
> > Replaced kzalloc() with kmalloc(), there is no need for zeroed-out
> > memory for simple void *kbuf.
>
> There is no need for zeroed-out memory because it's immediately
>
On Thu, 4 Feb 2021 15:02:30 +0600 Sabyrzhan Tasbolatov wrote:
> Replaced kzalloc() with kmalloc(), there is no need for zeroed-out
> memory for simple void *kbuf.
There is no need for zeroed-out memory because it's immediately
overwritten by copy_from_iter...
> >For potential, separate clean up
Replaced kzalloc() with kmalloc(), there is no need for zeroed-out
memory for simple void *kbuf.
>For potential, separate clean up - this is followed
>by copy_from_iter_full(len) kzalloc() can probably
>be replaced by kmalloc()?
>
>> if (!kbuf)
>> return -ENOMEM;
Signed-off-by
