Sure. Will make the changes in v2.
Thanks,
Bhaktipriya
On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 10:43 AM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 01:29:20PM +0530, Bhaktipriya Shridhar wrote:
>> The workqueue health->wq was used as per device private health thread.
>> This was done so that system error
On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 01:29:20PM +0530, Bhaktipriya Shridhar wrote:
> The workqueue health->wq was used as per device private health thread.
> This was done so that system error handling could be processed
> concurrently.
Not exactly, AFAIK it was intended to perform delayed work and not
relevan
The workqueue health->wq was used as per device private health thread.
This was done so that system error handling could be processed
concurrently. The workqueue has a single workitem(&health->work) and
hence doesn't require ordering. It is involved in handling the health of
the deviceand is not be
