From: Vegard Nossum
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 18:08:57 +0200
> We've already set sk to sock->sk and dereferenced it, so if it's NULL
> we would have crashed already. Moreover, if it was NULL we would have
> crashed anyway when jumping to 'out' and trying to unlock the sock.
> Furthermore, if we had
We've already set sk to sock->sk and dereferenced it, so if it's NULL
we would have crashed already. Moreover, if it was NULL we would have
crashed anyway when jumping to 'out' and trying to unlock the sock.
Furthermore, if we had assigned a different value to 'sk' we would
have been calling lock_s
