On 2017-05-22 14:26:44 [-0700], Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 12:26 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
> wrote:
> > Since commit 217f69743681 ("net: busy-poll: allow preemption in
> > sk_busy_loop()") there is an explicit do_softirq() invocation after
> > local_bh_enable() has been invo
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 12:26 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
wrote:
> Since commit 217f69743681 ("net: busy-poll: allow preemption in
> sk_busy_loop()") there is an explicit do_softirq() invocation after
> local_bh_enable() has been invoked.
> I don't understand why we need this because local_bh_en
Since commit 217f69743681 ("net: busy-poll: allow preemption in
sk_busy_loop()") there is an explicit do_softirq() invocation after
local_bh_enable() has been invoked.
I don't understand why we need this because local_bh_enable() will
invoke do_softirq() once the softirq counter reached zero and we
