Re: [PATCH] net/bonding: send arp in interval if no active slave

2015-09-28 Thread Jarod Wilson
Uwe Koziolek wrote: Am 03.09.2015 um 17:05 schrieb Jay Vosburgh: Uwe Koziolek wrote: On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 05:41 PM +0200, Andy Gospodarek wrote: On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 10:51:27PM +0200, Uwe Koziolek wrote: On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 09:14PM +0200, Jay Vosburgh wrote: Uwe Koziolek wrote:

Re: [PATCH] net/bonding: send arp in interval if no active slave

2015-09-04 Thread Uwe Koziolek
Am 03.09.2015 um 17:05 schrieb Jay Vosburgh: Uwe Koziolek wrote: On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 05:41 PM +0200, Andy Gospodarek wrote: On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 10:51:27PM +0200, Uwe Koziolek wrote: On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 09:14PM +0200, Jay Vosburgh wrote: Uwe Koziolek wrote: On2015-08-17 07:12

Re: [PATCH] net/bonding: send arp in interval if no active slave

2015-09-03 Thread Jay Vosburgh
Uwe Koziolek wrote: >On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 05:41 PM +0200, Andy Gospodarek wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 10:51:27PM +0200, Uwe Koziolek wrote: >>> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 09:14PM +0200, Jay Vosburgh wrote: Uwe Koziolek wrote: > On2015-08-17 07:12 PM,Jarod Wilson wrote: >>

Re: [PATCH] net/bonding: send arp in interval if no active slave

2015-09-01 Thread Uwe Koziolek
On Tue, 01.09.2015 at 00:21 +0200 Jarod Wilson wrote: On 2015-08-17 4:51 PM, Uwe Koziolek wrote: On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 09:14PM +0200, Jay Vosburgh wrote: Uwe Koziolek wrote: On2015-08-17 07:12 PM,Jarod Wilson wrote: ... Uwe, can you perhaps further enlighten us as to what num_grat_arp se

Re: [PATCH] net/bonding: send arp in interval if no active slave

2015-09-01 Thread Uwe Koziolek
On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 05:41 PM +0200, Andy Gospodarek wrote: On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 10:51:27PM +0200, Uwe Koziolek wrote: On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 09:14PM +0200, Jay Vosburgh wrote: Uwe Koziolek wrote: On2015-08-17 07:12 PM,Jarod Wilson wrote: On 2015-08-17 12:55 PM, Veaceslav Falico wrot

Re: [PATCH] net/bonding: send arp in interval if no active slave

2015-09-01 Thread Andy Gospodarek
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 10:51:27PM +0200, Uwe Koziolek wrote: > On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 09:14PM +0200, Jay Vosburgh wrote: > >Uwe Koziolek wrote: > > > >>On2015-08-17 07:12 PM,Jarod Wilson wrote: > >>>On 2015-08-17 12:55 PM, Veaceslav Falico wrote: > On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 12:23:03PM -0400, J

Re: [PATCH] net/bonding: send arp in interval if no active slave

2015-08-31 Thread Jarod Wilson
On 2015-08-17 4:51 PM, Uwe Koziolek wrote: On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 09:14PM +0200, Jay Vosburgh wrote: Uwe Koziolek wrote: On2015-08-17 07:12 PM,Jarod Wilson wrote: ... Uwe, can you perhaps further enlighten us as to what num_grat_arp settings were tried that didn't help? I'm still of the mi

Re: [PATCH] net/bonding: send arp in interval if no active slave

2015-08-17 Thread Uwe Koziolek
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 09:14PM +0200, Jay Vosburgh wrote: Uwe Koziolek wrote: On2015-08-17 07:12 PM,Jarod Wilson wrote: On 2015-08-17 12:55 PM, Veaceslav Falico wrote: On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 12:23:03PM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote: From: Uwe Koziolek With some very finicky switch hardware,

Re: [PATCH] net/bonding: send arp in interval if no active slave

2015-08-17 Thread Jay Vosburgh
Uwe Koziolek wrote: >On2015-08-17 07:12 PM,Jarod Wilson wrote: >> On 2015-08-17 12:55 PM, Veaceslav Falico wrote: >>> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 12:23:03PM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote: From: Uwe Koziolek With some very finicky switch hardware, active backup bonding can get into >>

Re: [PATCH] net/bonding: send arp in interval if no active slave

2015-08-17 Thread Uwe Koziolek
On2015-08-17 07:12 PM,Jarod Wilson wrote: On 2015-08-17 12:55 PM, Veaceslav Falico wrote: On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 12:23:03PM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote: From: Uwe Koziolek With some very finicky switch hardware, active backup bonding can get into a situation where we play ping-pong between int

Re: [PATCH] net/bonding: send arp in interval if no active slave

2015-08-17 Thread Jarod Wilson
On 2015-08-17 12:55 PM, Veaceslav Falico wrote: On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 12:23:03PM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote: From: Uwe Koziolek With some very finicky switch hardware, active backup bonding can get into a situation where we play ping-pong between interfaces, trying to get one to come up as th

Re: [PATCH] net/bonding: send arp in interval if no active slave

2015-08-17 Thread Veaceslav Falico
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 12:23:03PM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote: From: Uwe Koziolek With some very finicky switch hardware, active backup bonding can get into a situation where we play ping-pong between interfaces, trying to get one to come up as the active slave. There seems to be an issue with t

[PATCH] net/bonding: send arp in interval if no active slave

2015-08-17 Thread Jarod Wilson
From: Uwe Koziolek With some very finicky switch hardware, active backup bonding can get into a situation where we play ping-pong between interfaces, trying to get one to come up as the active slave. There seems to be an issue with the switch's arp replies either taking too long, or simply gettin