On Wed, 2007-07-18 at 02:08 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Johannes Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 14:26:04 +0200
>
> > Reading netlink_setsockopt it's not immediately clear why there isn't a
> > bug when you pass in negative numbers, the reason being that the >=
> > compari
From: Johannes Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 14:26:04 +0200
> Reading netlink_setsockopt it's not immediately clear why there isn't a
> bug when you pass in negative numbers, the reason being that the >=
> comparison is really unsigned although 'val' is signed because
> nlk->ngro
Reading netlink_setsockopt it's not immediately clear why there isn't a
bug when you pass in negative numbers, the reason being that the >=
comparison is really unsigned although 'val' is signed because
nlk->ngroups is unsigned. Make 'val' unsigned too.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <[EMAIL PROTECT
