On Monday 23 July 2007 13:49:17 Joy Latten wrote:
> > Will this cause existing applications to break?
>
> Perhaps someone in audit list could help answer this.
Probably. Its better to take a new number and let the old ones sit idle.
-Steve
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscri
On Thu, 2007-07-19 at 21:45 -0400, James Morris wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Jul 2007, Joy Latten wrote:
>
> > --- linux-2.6.22/include/linux/audit.h 2007-07-19 13:17:22.0
> > -0500
> > +++ linux-2.6.22.patch/include/linux/audit.h2007-07-19
> > 13:21:29.0 -0500
> > @@ -108,10
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007, Joy Latten wrote:
> --- linux-2.6.22/include/linux/audit.h2007-07-19 13:17:22.0
> -0500
> +++ linux-2.6.22.patch/include/linux/audit.h 2007-07-19 13:21:29.0
> -0500
> @@ -108,10 +108,7 @@
> #define AUDIT_MAC_CIPSOV4_DEL1408/* NetLabel: d
This patch modifies xfrm_audit_log() such that it
can accomodate auditing other ipsec events
besides add/delete of an SA or SPD entry.
This is a small change to accomodate updating
ipsec protocol to RFCs 4301, 4302 and 4303 which
require auditing some ipsec events if auditing
is available. Plea
