On Thu, 2016-10-13 at 14:55 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-10-13 at 15:44 +0300, Luca Coelho wrote:
> > Even though there is apparently something wrong with this part of the
> > ACPI table on you laptop, since it doesn't match our specifications.
> > In any case, it's mostly harmless.
>
On Thu, 2016-10-13 at 08:56 -0500, Chris Rorvick wrote:
> Hi Luca,
>
> > On Thu, 2016-10-13 at 13:21 +0300, Luca Coelho wrote:
> > Could you please give this a spin? I have tested it with some handmade
> > ACPI tables in QEMU and it seems to work fine now.
>
>
> Tested-by: Chris Rorvick
>
> I
Hi Luca,
> On Thu, 2016-10-13 at 13:21 +0300, Luca Coelho wrote:
> Could you please give this a spin? I have tested it with some handmade
> ACPI tables in QEMU and it seems to work fine now.
Tested-by: Chris Rorvick
I think the debug output looks as expected, see below for the first 20
lines or
On Thu, 2016-10-13 at 15:44 +0300, Luca Coelho wrote:
> Even though there is apparently something wrong with this part of the
> ACPI table on you laptop, since it doesn't match our specifications.
> In any case, it's mostly harmless.
Would a correct implementation by Dell have any benefits for t
On Thu, 2016-10-13 at 14:36 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-10-13 at 14:30 +0300, Luca Coelho wrote:
> > I forgot to say... could you load the iwlwifi module with debug=0x01
> > (module parameter), so we can see the messages the driver is printing
> > when it doesn't find a proper structure
On Thu, 2016-10-13 at 14:30 +0300, Luca Coelho wrote:
> I forgot to say... could you load the iwlwifi module with debug=0x01
> (module parameter), so we can see the messages the driver is printing
> when it doesn't find a proper structure?
That makes a lot of noise! Here's the first 100 lines or s
On Thu, 2016-10-13 at 13:27 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> Luca,
>
> On Thu, 2016-10-13 at 13:21 +0300, Luca Coelho wrote:
> > Could you please give this a spin? I have tested it with some handmade
> > ACPI tables in QEMU and it seems to work fine now.
>
>
> Tested-by: Paul Bolle
>
> Not that this
Luca,
On Thu, 2016-10-13 at 13:21 +0300, Luca Coelho wrote:
> Could you please give this a spin? I have tested it with some handmade
> ACPI tables in QEMU and it seems to work fine now.
Tested-by: Paul Bolle
Not that this test was worth a lot: it builds cleanly (on top of
4.8.1), the error at b
From: Luca Coelho
The SPLC data parsing is too restrictive and was not trying find the
correct element for WiFi. This causes problems with some BIOSes where
the SPLC method exists, but doesn't have a WiFi entry on the first
element of the list. The domain type values are also incorrect
accordin
