On Wed, 2017-11-08 at 08:29 -0800, Francesco Ruggeri wrote:
> Any comments about this?
> The idea is to avoid traversing all mr6_tables (which requires
> the rtnl_lock) in ip6mr_sk_done(), when we know in advance
> that a match will not be found.
> This can happen when rawv6_close()/ip6mr_sk_done()
Any comments about this?
The idea is to avoid traversing all mr6_tables (which requires
the rtnl_lock) in ip6mr_sk_done(), when we know in advance
that a match will not be found.
This can happen when rawv6_close()/ip6mr_sk_done() is invoked
on non-mroute6 sockets.
Thanks,
Francesco
On Mon, Nov 6,
commit 9634257773c30ce13d74fa4918329612c60d84a8
Author: Francesco Ruggeri
Date: Mon Nov 6 11:01:59 2017 -0800
ipv6: try not to take rtnl_lock in ip6mr_sk_done
mrt->mroute6_sk can only be set to a non-NULL value in ip6mr_sk_init()
if sk->sk_type == SOCK_RAW && inet_sk(sk)->inet_
