On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 1:24 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-12-02 at 15:18 -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>> name[i] = '@';
>> >
>> > ss.c: In function 'unix_show_sock':
>> > ss.c:3128:4: error: 'for' loop initial declarations are only allowed in
>> > C
On Fri, 2016-12-02 at 15:18 -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> name[i] = '@';
> >
> > ss.c: In function 'unix_show_sock':
> > ss.c:3128:4: error: 'for' loop initial declarations are only allowed in C99
> > mode
> > ss.c:3128:4: note: use option -std=c99 or -std=
On Fri, 02 Dec 2016 10:59:56 -0800
Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Sat, 2016-11-12 at 10:17 +0300, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > On Sat, 29 Oct 2016 22:20:19 +0300
> > Isaac Boukris wrote:
> >
> > > Abstract unix domain socket may embed null characters,
> > > these should be translated to '@' when pr
On Sat, 2016-11-12 at 10:17 +0300, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Oct 2016 22:20:19 +0300
> Isaac Boukris wrote:
>
> > Abstract unix domain socket may embed null characters,
> > these should be translated to '@' when printed by ss the
> > same way the null prefix is currently being transla
On Sat, 29 Oct 2016 22:20:19 +0300
Isaac Boukris wrote:
> Abstract unix domain socket may embed null characters,
> these should be translated to '@' when printed by ss the
> same way the null prefix is currently being translated.
>
> Signed-off-by: Isaac Boukris
Applied
Abstract unix domain socket may embed null characters,
these should be translated to '@' when printed by ss the
same way the null prefix is currently being translated.
Signed-off-by: Isaac Boukris
---
misc/ss.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/misc/ss.c b/mi
