Dan Williams wrote:
To me, it looks like you're trying to use dBm rather than RSSI here. In
that case, you have to set range->max_qual.level to 0, because the upper
bound of dBm is indeed 0. If you are using negative values _anywhere_
in your code for quality, you're almost certainly using dBm
On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 23:08 -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
> This patch improves the statistics returned from bcm43xx_get_wireless_stats.
> The signal level comes
> from smoothing the rssi value returned by the firmware. The quality value is
> a hack derived from the
> smoothed rssi value and an assu
Michael Buesch wrote:
On Thursday 29 June 2006 06:08, Larry Finger wrote:
/* fill in the real statistics when iface associated */
- wstats->qual.qual = 100; // TODO: get the real signal quality
- wstats->qual.level = 3 - bcm->stats.link_quality;
+ list_for_each_entr
On Thursday 29 June 2006 06:08, Larry Finger wrote:
> This patch improves the statistics returned from bcm43xx_get_wireless_stats.
> The signal level comes
> from smoothing the rssi value returned by the firmware. The quality value is
> a hack derived from the
> smoothed rssi value and an assumed
This patch improves the statistics returned from bcm43xx_get_wireless_stats.
The signal level comes
from smoothing the rssi value returned by the firmware. The quality value is a
hack derived from the
smoothed rssi value and an assumed rssi_max of -25. If anyone has a better
value, please let m
