On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 01:31:09PM -0700, Phil Hofer wrote:
> I've made some changes based on advice from Willy Tarreau.
> The changes don't influence the IPv6 performance numbers on our board
> relative to the previous patch. I still get about 90% of IPv4
> performance.
>
> Enabling NETIF_F_TSO6
I've made some changes based on advice from Willy Tarreau.
The changes don't influence the IPv6 performance numbers on our board
relative to the previous patch. I still get about 90% of IPv4
performance.
Enabling NETIF_F_TSO6 still causes problems; that will probably have
to be addressed in a sepa
My apologies.
I have a follow-up on the way with some of Willy's suggested changes as well.
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 11:52 AM, Thomas Petazzoni
wrote:
> Hello Phil,
>
> On Fri, 26 Jun 2015 11:12:03 -0700, Phil Hofer wrote:
>> TCP performance over IPv6 was only about 60% of IPv4 performance. This
Hello Phil,
On Fri, 26 Jun 2015 11:12:03 -0700, Phil Hofer wrote:
> TCP performance over IPv6 was only about 60% of IPv4 performance. This
> patch makes up most (but not all) of the difference.
>
> Signed off by: Thomas Petazzoni (thomas.petazz...@free-electrons.com)
What makes you think you can
TCP performance over IPv6 was only about 60% of IPv4 performance. This
patch makes up most (but not all) of the difference.
Signed off by: Thomas Petazzoni (thomas.petazz...@free-electrons.com)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
index 5bdf78
