On Fri, 13 Jan 2006, David S. Miller wrote:
> From: Per Liden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 21:56:53 +0100 (CET)
>
> > Signed-off-by: Per Liden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> BTW, don't do this, it should be a perfectly functioning
> email address so that people can contact you.
Ok, sor
From: Per Liden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 21:56:53 +0100 (CET)
> On Fri, 13 Jan 2006, David S. Miller wrote:
>
> > From: Jamal Hadi Salim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 09:30:27 -0500
> >
> > > On Fri, 2006-13-01 at 09:27 +0100, Per Liden wrote:
> > > > Increasin
From: Per Liden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 21:56:53 +0100 (CET)
> Signed-off-by: Per Liden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
BTW, don't do this, it should be a perfectly functioning
email address so that people can contact you.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev
don't have a copy of this patch in my inbox, can someone
> resend it to me? Thanks.
Resending.
/Per
[PATCH] genetlink: don't touch module ref count
Increasing the module ref count at registration will block the module from
ever being unloaded. In fact, genetlink should not care abo
From: Jamal Hadi Salim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 09:30:27 -0500
> On Fri, 2006-13-01 at 09:27 +0100, Per Liden wrote:
> > Increasing the module ref count at registration will block the module from
> > ever being unloaded. In fact, genetlink should not care about the owner at
> > a
Hi Thomas,
On Fri, 13 Jan 2006, Thomas Graf wrote:
> * Per Liden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2006-01-13 09:27
> > Increasing the module ref count at registration will block the module from
> > ever being unloaded. In fact, genetlink should not care about the owner at
> > all. This patch removes the owner
* Per Liden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2006-01-13 09:27
> Increasing the module ref count at registration will block the module from
> ever being unloaded. In fact, genetlink should not care about the owner at
> all. This patch removes the owner field from the struct registered with
> genetlink.
Why shou
On Fri, 2006-13-01 at 09:27 +0100, Per Liden wrote:
> Increasing the module ref count at registration will block the module from
> ever being unloaded. In fact, genetlink should not care about the owner at
> all. This patch removes the owner field from the struct registered with
> genetlink.
>
> S
Increasing the module ref count at registration will block the module from
ever being unloaded. In fact, genetlink should not care about the owner at
all. This patch removes the owner field from the struct registered with
genetlink.
Signed-off-by: Per Liden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
include/net/g
