Re: [PATCH] fs_enet: Don't call phy_mii_ioctl() in atomic context.

2008-02-20 Thread Jeff Garzik
Scott Wood wrote: The lock acquisition in fs_ioctl() does not appear to actually be necessary, and thus is simply removed. Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- This fixes the following bug: http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2008-February/051564.html drivers/net/fs_enet/fs_e

RE: [PATCH] fs_enet: Don't call phy_mii_ioctl() in atomic context.

2008-02-15 Thread Rune Torgersen
Scott Wood wrote: > The lock acquisition in fs_ioctl() does not appear to actually be > necessary, and thus is simply removed. > > Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- > This fixes the following bug: > http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2008-February/051564.html > > drivers/ne

[PATCH] fs_enet: Don't call phy_mii_ioctl() in atomic context.

2008-02-15 Thread Scott Wood
The lock acquisition in fs_ioctl() does not appear to actually be necessary, and thus is simply removed. Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- This fixes the following bug: http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2008-February/051564.html drivers/net/fs_enet/fs_enet-main.c |7 +-