RE: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] fm10k: Don't assume page fragments are page size

2015-09-01 Thread Singh, Krishneil K
x27;t assume page fragments are page size This change pulls out the optimization that assumed that all fragments would be limited to page size. That hasn't been the case for some time now and to assume this is incorrect as the TCP allocator can provide up to a 32K page fragment. Sig

Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] fm10k: Don't assume page fragments are page size

2015-06-16 Thread Keller, Jacob E
Acked-by: Jacob Keller Regards, Jake On Tue, 2015-06-16 at 11:47 -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote: > This change pulls out the optimization that assumed that all > fragments > would be limited to page size. That hasn't been the case for some > time now > and to assume this is incorrect as the TCP

[PATCH] fm10k: Don't assume page fragments are page size

2015-06-16 Thread Alexander Duyck
This change pulls out the optimization that assumed that all fragments would be limited to page size. That hasn't been the case for some time now and to assume this is incorrect as the TCP allocator can provide up to a 32K page fragment. Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck --- drivers/net/ethernet/i