On Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 01:37:59AM +, Nguyen, Anthony L wrote:
> On Sat, 2021-02-27 at 10:58 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > The include guard for the e1000e and e1000 hw.h files are the same,
> > so
> > add the proper "E" term to the hw.h file for the e1000e driver.
>
> There's a patch i
On Sat, 2021-02-27 at 10:58 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> The include guard for the e1000e and e1000 hw.h files are the same,
> so
> add the proper "E" term to the hw.h file for the e1000e driver.
There's a patch in process that addresses this issue [1].
> This resolves some static analyzer
The include guard for the e1000e and e1000 hw.h files are the same, so
add the proper "E" term to the hw.h file for the e1000e driver.
This resolves some static analyzer warnings, like the one found by the
"lgtm.com" tool.
Cc: Jesse Brandeburg
Cc: Tony Nguyen
Cc: "David S. Miller"
Cc: Jakub Ki
