On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 23:02:52 +0200
Jean Delvare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> On 10/11/06, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > On Wed, 11 Oct 2006, Jesse Brandeburg wrote:
> > > On 10/11/06, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > > > Let the e1000 driver report the most important statistics (rx/tx_bytes
Hi Jesse,
On 10/11/06, Jesse Brandeburg wrote:
> On 10/11/06, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > Let the e1000 driver report the most important statistics (rx/tx_bytes
> > and rx/tx_packets) in real time, rather than every other second. This
> > is similar to what the e100 driver is doing.
> >
> > The curren
Hi Stephen,
On 10/11/06, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Oct 2006, Jesse Brandeburg wrote:
> > On 10/11/06, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > > Let the e1000 driver report the most important statistics (rx/tx_bytes
> > > and rx/tx_packets) in real time, rather than every other second. This
> > > is si
On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 10:44:12 -0700
"Jesse Brandeburg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/11/06, Jean Delvare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This patch is posted for review and comments.
> >
> > Let the e1000 driver report the most important statistics (rx/tx_bytes
> > and rx/tx_pac
On 10/11/06, Jean Delvare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,
This patch is posted for review and comments.
Let the e1000 driver report the most important statistics (rx/tx_bytes
and rx/tx_packets) in real time, rather than every other second. This
is similar to what the e100 driver is doing.
T
Hi all,
This patch is posted for review and comments.
Let the e1000 driver report the most important statistics (rx/tx_bytes
and rx/tx_packets) in real time, rather than every other second. This
is similar to what the e100 driver is doing.
The current asynchronous statistics refresh model makes
