Re: [PATCH] e100: re-enable microcode with more useful defaults

2005-11-18 Thread Jeff Garzik
Jesse Brandeburg wrote: For the four versions of hardware that we (currently) support microcode download on, the default configuration of our receive interrupt mitigation microcode was too aggressive, and caused unnecessary delays when pinging, and low(er) throughput on single connection latenc

Re: [PATCH] e100: re-enable microcode with more useful defaults

2005-11-14 Thread Ian McDonald
> Signed-off-by: Jesse Brandeburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Ian McDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Just a note to people given my history in flagging this one earlier - I have tested this for latency and throughput. With the previous patch I was getting 20 msec ping and 25 Mbit throughput. Now

[PATCH] e100: re-enable microcode with more useful defaults

2005-11-14 Thread Jesse Brandeburg
For the four versions of hardware that we (currently) support microcode download on, the default configuration of our receive interrupt mitigation microcode was too aggressive, and caused unnecessary delays when pinging, and low(er) throughput on single connection latency sensitive performance