Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: Cleanup standard unit properties

2021-01-29 Thread Alexandre Torgue
On 1/28/21 8:45 PM, Rob Herring wrote: Properties with standard unit suffixes already have a type and don't need type definitions. They also default to a single entry, so 'maxItems: 1' can be dropped. adi,ad5758 is an oddball which defined an enum of arrays. While a valid schema, it is simple

Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: Cleanup standard unit properties

2021-01-28 Thread Alexandre Belloni
On 28/01/2021 13:45:15-0600, Rob Herring wrote: > Properties with standard unit suffixes already have a type and don't need > type definitions. They also default to a single entry, so 'maxItems: 1' > can be dropped. > > adi,ad5758 is an oddball which defined an enum of arrays. While a valid > sche

Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: Cleanup standard unit properties

2021-01-28 Thread Wolfram Sang
On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 12:16:14PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 01:45:15PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > > Properties with standard unit suffixes already have a type and don't need > > type definitions. They also default to a single entry, so 'maxItems: 1' > > can be dropped.

Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: Cleanup standard unit properties

2021-01-28 Thread Mark Brown
On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 01:45:15PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > Properties with standard unit suffixes already have a type and don't need > type definitions. They also default to a single entry, so 'maxItems: 1' > can be dropped. Acked-by: Mark Brown signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: Cleanup standard unit properties

2021-01-28 Thread Guenter Roeck
On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 01:45:15PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > Properties with standard unit suffixes already have a type and don't need > type definitions. They also default to a single entry, so 'maxItems: 1' > can be dropped. > > adi,ad5758 is an oddball which defined an enum of arrays. While a