On Sat, 6 Jan 2007 20:09:36 +0100, Ivo Van Doorn wrote:
> [...]
> @@ -359,7 +361,7 @@ static int ieee80211_ioctl_remove_sta(struct
> net_device *dev,
The patch is line-wrapped here. Applied, but please try to fix your
mail client settings.
Thanks for the patch,
Jiri
--
Jiri Benc
SUSE Labs
-
T
> Bit ordering, I see. Then go for my original patch + comments why this
> is open-coded in __bss_tim_set/clear + removed unused arguments from
> those functions, OK?
Sounds good to me, care to send a new patch?
This patch returns to the original format for setting and clearing the tim bit,
as
On Sat, 2007-01-06 at 18:00 +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Johannes Berg wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-01-05 at 21:08 +0100, Ivo van Doorn wrote:
> >
> >> This patch uses the __set_bit and __clear_but as suggested by Christoph.
> >> It also removes the local argument since it was unused.
> >
> > NACK. This
Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-01-05 at 21:08 +0100, Ivo van Doorn wrote:
>
>> This patch uses the __set_bit and __clear_but as suggested by Christoph.
>> It also removes the local argument since it was unused.
>
> NACK. This breaks spec compliance for drivers that use the TIM in their
> bea
On Sat, 2007-01-06 at 17:52 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-01-05 at 21:08 +0100, Ivo van Doorn wrote:
>
> > This patch uses the __set_bit and __clear_but as suggested by Christoph.
> > It also removes the local argument since it was unused.
>
> NACK. This breaks spec compliance for dr
On Fri, 2007-01-05 at 21:08 +0100, Ivo van Doorn wrote:
> This patch uses the __set_bit and __clear_but as suggested by Christoph.
> It also removes the local argument since it was unused.
NACK. This breaks spec compliance for drivers that use the TIM in their
beacon frames.
johannes
signature
On Tue, 2007-01-02 at 16:22 +, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> This really screams to be converted to __set_bit.
Whoops, I should really have jumped into this thread earlier but somehow
missed it.
This cannot be converted to __set_bit because the IEEE specs mandate
this format.
We can insert a c
Ivo van Doorn wrote:
> +#define __bss_tim_set(__bss, __aid) __set_bit((__aid), &(__bss)->tim)
> +
__set/clear_bit demands unsigned long, tim is u8. That causes quite some
warnings here.
...
> static inline void bss_tim_clear(struct ieee80211_local *local,
>struct
On Tuesday 02 January 2007 17:22, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 04:30:41PM +0100, Ivo Van Doorn wrote:
> > +static inline void __bss_tim_set(struct ieee80211_local *local,
> > +struct ieee80211_if_ap *bss, int aid)
> > +{
> > + bss->tim[(aid)/8] |=
On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 04:30:41PM +0100, Ivo Van Doorn wrote:
> +static inline void __bss_tim_set(struct ieee80211_local *local,
> + struct ieee80211_if_ap *bss, int aid)
> +{
> + bss->tim[(aid)/8] |= 1<<((aid) % 8);
> +}
This really screams to be converted to __s
On 1/1/07, Jan Kiszka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hacking a bit on rt2x00 to make it work in master and ad-hoc mode, lockdep
popped up on some hostapd ioctls, pointing out remaining inconsistencies
related to sta_lock:
1. sta_lock holders must always be protected against softirq
2. bss_tim_set/cl
Hacking a bit on rt2x00 to make it work in master and ad-hoc mode, lockdep
popped up on some hostapd ioctls, pointing out remaining inconsistencies
related to sta_lock:
1. sta_lock holders must always be protected against softirq
2. bss_tim_set/clear must not be called with sta_lock held, rather a
12 matches
Mail list logo
