On Tuesday, October 25, 2016 1:24:55 PM CEST David Laight wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/wsm.c
> > b/drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/wsm.c
> > index 680d60eabc75..094e6637ade2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/wsm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/wsm.
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 01:24:55PM +, David Laight wrote:
> > - if (count > 1) {
> > - /* We already released one buffer, now for the rest */
> > - ret = wsm_release_tx_buffer(priv, count - 1);
> > - if (ret < 0)
> > - return ret;
> > -
From: Of Arnd Bergmann
> Sent: 24 October 2016 16:42
> On x86, the cw1200 driver produces a rather silly warning about the
> possible use of the 'ret' variable without an initialization
> presumably after being confused by the architecture specific definition
> of WARN_ON:
>
> drivers/net/wirele
On x86, the cw1200 driver produces a rather silly warning about the
possible use of the 'ret' variable without an initialization
presumably after being confused by the architecture specific definition
of WARN_ON:
drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/wsm.c: In function ‘wsm_handle_rx’:
drivers/net/wirele
