From: Stefan Rompf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 00:13:35 +0100
> Signed-Off-By: Stefan Rompf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This looks fine, patch applied to net-2.6.17
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordo
On Sun, 2005-11-12 at 23:33 -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
> From: jamal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2005 19:03:17 -0500
>
> > What you in submitting the patch is probably a better approach to break
> > any stalemate. I think its time we need to have Dave and Jeff both
> > involved - we
From: jamal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2005 19:03:17 -0500
> What you in submitting the patch is probably a better approach to break
> any stalemate. I think its time we need to have Dave and Jeff both
> involved - we get to hear other opinions and i dont think the difference
> of opini
On Thu, 2005-08-12 at 00:13 +0100, Stefan Rompf wrote:
> It is the result of our long discussion. However I must admit that it
> represents what Jamal and I agreed on with compromises towards Krzysztof, but
> Thomas and Krzysztof still disagree with some parts. Anyway I think it should
> be app
Hi David,
this patch adds a dormant flag to network devices, RFC2863 operstate derived
from these flags and possibility for userspace interaction. It allows drivers
to signal that a device is unusable for user traffic without disabling
queueing (and therefore the possibility for protocol establ
