applied
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 06:46:12AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 04:36:26PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 12:59:29AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > > Would you be kind enough to resend -again-, rediff'd against latest
> > > upstream git tree
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 04:36:26PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 12:59:29AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > Would you be kind enough to resend -again-, rediff'd against latest
> > upstream git tree?
>
> Here we go..
and here it is again, rediffed against the nth time:
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 12:59:29AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Would you be kind enough to resend -again-, rediff'd against latest
> upstream git tree?
Here we go..
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Index: linux-2.6/include/net/ieee80211_crypt.h
==
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 12:59:29AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >Index: linux-2.6/net/ieee80211/ieee80211_crypt.c
> >===
> >--- linux-2.6.orig/net/ieee80211/ieee80211_crypt.c 2005-09-05
> >14:38:19.0 +0200
> >+++ linux-2.6/ne
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 12:48:45PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
I understand removing the NULL pointers, but .name is actually a string
"NULL".. Leaving it to be NULL is not a very good idea. This "NULL"
algorithm was designed for cases where there is default algorithm for
On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 12:48:45PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >>I understand removing the NULL pointers, but .name is actually a string
> >>"NULL".. Leaving it to be NULL is not a very good idea. This "NULL"
> >>algorithm was designed for cases where there is default algorithm for
> >>encryption a
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 11:15:20AM +0300, Jouni Malinen wrote:
I understand removing the NULL pointers, but .name is actually a string
"NULL".. Leaving it to be NULL is not a very good idea. This "NULL"
algorithm was designed for cases where there is default algorithm f
On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 11:15:20AM +0300, Jouni Malinen wrote:
> I understand removing the NULL pointers, but .name is actually a string
> "NULL".. Leaving it to be NULL is not a very good idea. This "NULL"
> algorithm was designed for cases where there is default algorithm for
> encryption and enc
- use proper list handling
- avoid hcrypt structure, just use a proper static list_head and
spinlock
- use proper instead of the variants
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Index: linux-2.6/net/ieee80211/ieee80211_crypt.c
10 matches
Mail list logo