Hello Manfred,
On 22.06.2015 11:48, Manfred Schlaegl wrote:
Can you tell me the output of /proc/sys/net/core/netdev_tstamp_prequeue on
your machine?
/proc/sys/net/core/netdev_tstamp_prequeue is set to 1 (unmodified, default)
I tried to dig a little deeper in timestamping:
1. (net/core/dev.
Hello Oliver,
On 2015-06-21 00:42, Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
>> 514ac99c64b22d83b52dfee3b8becaa69a92bc4a introduces a frame equality
>> check. Since the sk_buff pointer is not sufficient to do this (buffers
>> are reused), the check also compares time stamps.
>> In short: pointer+time stamp was assu
Hello Manfred,
On 06/20/2015 07:21 PM, Manfred Schlaegl wrote:
> I've detected a massive loss of can frames on i.MX6 using flexcan
> driver with 4.1-rc8 and tracked this down to following commit:
> 514ac99c64b22d83b52dfee3b8becaa69a92bc4a - "can: fix multiple delivery
> of a single CAN frame for o
I've detected a massive loss of can frames on i.MX6 using flexcan
driver with 4.1-rc8 and tracked this down to following commit:
514ac99c64b22d83b52dfee3b8becaa69a92bc4a - "can: fix multiple delivery
of a single CAN frame for overlapping CAN filters"
514ac99c64b22d83b52dfee3b8becaa69a92bc4a introd
I've detected a massive loss of can frames on i.MX6 using flexcan
driver with 4.1-rc8 and tracked this down to following commit:
514ac99c64b22d83b52dfee3b8becaa69a92bc4a - "can: fix multiple delivery
of a single CAN frame for overlapping CAN filters"
514ac99c64b22d83b52dfee3b8becaa69a92bc4a introd
