On 09/08/2017 05:02 PM, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King
>
> The assignment of net via call sock_net will dereference sk. This
> is performed before a sanity null check on sk, so there could be
> a potential null dereference on the sock_net call if sk is null.
> Fix this by assigning net
On 10/16/2017 06:37 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 1:46 PM, Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
On 09/08/2017 05:02 PM, Colin King wrote:
From: Colin Ian King
The assignment of net via call sock_net will dereference sk. This
is performed before a sanity null check on sk, so there could b
On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 1:46 PM, Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
>
>
> On 09/08/2017 05:02 PM, Colin King wrote:
>>
>> From: Colin Ian King
>>
>> The assignment of net via call sock_net will dereference sk. This
>> is performed before a sanity null check on sk, so there could be
>> a potential null derefer
On 09/08/2017 05:02 PM, Colin King wrote:
From: Colin Ian King
The assignment of net via call sock_net will dereference sk. This
is performed before a sanity null check on sk, so there could be
a potential null dereference on the sock_net call if sk is null.
Fix this by assigning net after th
From: Colin Ian King
The assignment of net via call sock_net will dereference sk. This
is performed before a sanity null check on sk, so there could be
a potential null dereference on the sock_net call if sk is null.
Fix this by assigning net after the sk null check. Also replace
the sk == NULL w