From: Yang Shi
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 15:16:26 -0700
> When running bpf samples on rt kernel, it reports the below warning:
...
> Convert hashtab lock to raw lock to avoid such warning.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yang Shi
Applied to net-next, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "u
On 11/2/2015 9:24 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Mon, 02 Nov 2015 09:12:29 -0800
"Shi, Yang" wrote:
Yes, it is common practice for converting sleepable spin lock to raw
spin lock in -rt to avoid scheduling in atomic context bug.
Note, in a lot of cases we don't just convert spin_locks to raw b
On 11/02/2015 06:12 PM, Shi, Yang wrote:
...
If you think such info is necessary, I definitely could add it into the commit
log in v2.
As this is going to be documented anyway (thanks! ;)), and the discussion
to this patch can be found in the archives for those wondering, I'm good:
Acked-by:
On Mon, 02 Nov 2015 09:12:29 -0800
"Shi, Yang" wrote:
> Yes, it is common practice for converting sleepable spin lock to raw
> spin lock in -rt to avoid scheduling in atomic context bug.
Note, in a lot of cases we don't just convert spin_locks to raw because
of atomic context. There's times we
On 10/31/2015 11:37 AM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
On 10/31/2015 02:47 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Fri, 30 Oct 2015 17:03:58 -0700
Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 03:16:26PM -0700, Yang Shi wrote:
When running bpf samples on rt kernel, it reports the below warning:
BUG: sleepi
On 11/2/2015 12:59 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Sun, 1 Nov 2015, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 09:47:36AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Fri, 30 Oct 2015 17:03:58 -0700
Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 03:16:26PM -0700, Yang Shi wrote:
When running bpf
On Sun, 1 Nov 2015, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 09:47:36AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Fri, 30 Oct 2015 17:03:58 -0700
> > Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 03:16:26PM -0700, Yang Shi wrote:
> > > > When running bpf samples on rt kernel, i
On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 09:47:36AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Oct 2015 17:03:58 -0700
> Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 03:16:26PM -0700, Yang Shi wrote:
> > > When running bpf samples on rt kernel, it reports the below warning:
> > >
> > > BUG: sleeping fu
On 10/31/2015 02:47 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Fri, 30 Oct 2015 17:03:58 -0700
Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 03:16:26PM -0700, Yang Shi wrote:
When running bpf samples on rt kernel, it reports the below warning:
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at
kern
On Fri, 30 Oct 2015 17:03:58 -0700
Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 03:16:26PM -0700, Yang Shi wrote:
> > When running bpf samples on rt kernel, it reports the below warning:
> >
> > BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at
> > kernel/locking/rtmutex.c:917
> > in
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 03:16:26PM -0700, Yang Shi wrote:
> When running bpf samples on rt kernel, it reports the below warning:
>
> BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at
> kernel/locking/rtmutex.c:917
> in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 128, pid: 477, name: ping
> Preemption disab
When running bpf samples on rt kernel, it reports the below warning:
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at
kernel/locking/rtmutex.c:917
in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 128, pid: 477, name: ping
Preemption disabled at:[] kprobe_perf_func+0x30/0x228
CPU: 3 PID: 477 Comm: ping Not
12 matches
Mail list logo