On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 10:13 AM Jiri Olsa wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 01, 2020 at 03:12:13PM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 12:00 PM Song Liu wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 8:45 AM Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Currenty lsm uses bpf_tracing_func_proto helpe
On Mon, Jun 01, 2020 at 03:12:13PM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 12:00 PM Song Liu wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 8:45 AM Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > >
> > > Currenty lsm uses bpf_tracing_func_proto helpers which do
> > > not include stack trace or perf event output.
On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 3:12 PM Alexei Starovoitov
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 12:00 PM Song Liu wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 8:45 AM Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > >
> > > Currenty lsm uses bpf_tracing_func_proto helpers which do
> > > not include stack trace or perf event output. It's use
On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 12:00 PM Song Liu wrote:
>
> On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 8:45 AM Jiri Olsa wrote:
> >
> > Currenty lsm uses bpf_tracing_func_proto helpers which do
> > not include stack trace or perf event output. It's useful
> > to have those for bpftrace lsm support [1].
> >
> > Using tracin
On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 8:45 AM Jiri Olsa wrote:
>
> Currenty lsm uses bpf_tracing_func_proto helpers which do
> not include stack trace or perf event output. It's useful
> to have those for bpftrace lsm support [1].
>
> Using tracing_prog_func_proto helpers for lsm programs.
How about using raw_
Currenty lsm uses bpf_tracing_func_proto helpers which do
not include stack trace or perf event output. It's useful
to have those for bpftrace lsm support [1].
Using tracing_prog_func_proto helpers for lsm programs.
[1] https://github.com/iovisor/bpftrace/pull/1347
Cc: KP Singh
Signed-off-by: J
