From: Rafał Miłecki
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 22:26:48 +0100
> Are you applying it to net-next? It way my intention, sorry if I was
> supposed to make it more clear.
You are always supposed to specify this explicitly, in the
Subject line, after PATCH, like "[PATCH net-next] bgmac: ..."
On 19 February 2016 at 21:37, David Miller wrote:
> From: Rafał Miłecki
> Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 07:48:28 +0100
>
>> It needs very similar workarounds to the one on BCM4707. It was tested
>> on D-Link DIR-885L home router.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki
>
> This patch doesn't apply, I get re
From: Rafał Miłecki
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 07:48:28 +0100
> It needs very similar workarounds to the one on BCM4707. It was tested
> on D-Link DIR-885L home router.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki
This patch doesn't apply, I get rejects.
It needs very similar workarounds to the one on BCM4707. It was tested
on D-Link DIR-885L home router.
Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki
---
drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bgmac.c | 6 --
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bgmac.c
b/drivers
