Jean,
Jean Tourrilhes wrote:
I must admit that the original definition was too clever (or
too ambiguous, or too original, take your pick). range->max_qual.level
is always supposed to have a meaningfull value. People that did not
understand that original definition just put 0 there, as i
On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 11:37:45PM -0400, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-07-11 at 23:03 -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
> > Dan Williams wrote:
> > >
> > > NAK... remember, range->max_qual.level must be _0_ if you're in dBm,
> >
> > I do not think this is right. From the comments in include/linux/
Dan Williams wrote:
Jean, what's the official word on range->max_qual.level?
I don't know where I came up with the requirement that max_qual.level
must be 0 to indicate that the units are in dBm (as opposed to RSSI),
but it might well have been because we had no way to detect RSSI vs. dBm
befor
On Tue, 2006-07-11 at 23:03 -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
> Dan Williams wrote:
> >
> > NAK... remember, range->max_qual.level must be _0_ if you're in dBm,
>
> I do not think this is right. From the comments in include/linux/wireless.h:
>
> /* Quality of link & SNR stuff */
> /*
Dan Williams wrote:
NAK... remember, range->max_qual.level must be _0_ if you're in dBm,
I do not think this is right. From the comments in include/linux/wireless.h:
/* Quality of link & SNR stuff */
/* Quality range (link, level, noise)
* If the quality is absolute,
On Tue, 2006-07-11 at 11:04 -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
> This minor patch adjusts the parameters of the wireless statistics to improve
> the display of
> programs such as the "Wireless Network Information" applet of KDE.
>
> Signed-Off-By: Larry Finger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> ==
This minor patch adjusts the parameters of the wireless statistics to improve the display of
programs such as the "Wireless Network Information" applet of KDE.
Signed-Off-By: Larry Finger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
==
diff --git a/drivers/
